Mr. Mom (1983) Guest Review

20140306-111058 am.jpg

This guest review for the John Hughes Blogathon comes from Josh of JJames Reviews. Thanks for this, Josh! Let’s see what he thought of Mr. Mom. 🙂

20140305-111408 pm.jpg

Mr. Mom (1983)

Directed By: Stan Dragoti

Written By: John Hughes

Michael Keaton
Teri Garr
Martin Mall
Ann Jillian
Jeffrey Tambor
Carolyn Seymour

Running Time: 92 minutes

Plot Synopsis:

Jack Butler (Michael Keaton) loses his job. When his wife, Caroline (Teri Garr) finds work before he does, Jack stays home with their three children. Both Jack and Caroline must grapple with personal identity crises as they adapt to their new responsibilities.

20140305-111644 pm.jpg

My Opinion

Humor is Mr. Mom’s greatest strength. Even after thirty-plus years, it is funny enough to maintain attention, not least because it features many quotable lines: “220, 221, whatever it takes;” “Well, you should take pride with some of that fat, porky;” “You can give me two. I don’t know what the hell I’m doing;” and more. Writer John Hughes and Director Stan Dragoti deliver laugh out loud moments with such frequency that Mr. Mom never lags, never becomes less than entertaining.

20140305-111750 pm.jpg

Humor is not the film’s only strength. In Jack and Caroline, Hughes and Dragoti develop two relatively complex lead characters. Both are believable and generate concern, facts that mean we can root for them and be happy when they finally start to adapt. Their stories are not dramatic masterpiece material, of course, but they are soulful enough to give this comedy weight.

Minor characters, like Joan (Ann Jillian), Ron (Martin Mull) and Jinx (Jeffrey Tambor) have only one note, but Mr. Mom does not suffer for their lack of development. Why? Because the minor characters’ purpose is to fuel humor, not to drive drama, and they are all very funny.

20140305-111846 pm.jpg

As impressively, Hughes and Dragoti mark passage of time seamlessly and quickly, without ever resorting to cheap narrative tricks or lengthy exposition. They do not overwhelm their film with plot-filling montages, instead trusting skillful editing, simple dialogue and visual cues to fill in temporal gaps. Consider how we learn Caroline has found a job, or how we see Jack’s struggle to adjust to his new lifestyle.

Mr. Mom’s performances are also very good. Michael Keaton is enchanting in this comedic role, using exaggerated gestures and facial expressions to deliver punch lines convincingly. Martin Mull is just as good as a sleazy boss with inappropriate intent toward to his female subordinate, and Teri Garr plays the comedy straight man well, providing just enough stabilization to support Keaton’s attention grabbing efforts.

20140305-111937 pm.jpg

Yet, this film is not perfect. Chief amongst its flaws is that it has not aged well. Set aside the 1980s fashion, hairstyle and decorations. Consider instead the way Mr. Mom panders to sexist stereotypes. Men do not know how to shop the supermarket; women are scorned by executive work forces; housewives watch soap operas and mostly ignore their children; and so forth. In 1983, Mr. Mom’s hyperbole no doubt effectively questioned society’s perceptions of gender roles, but in 2014, it isn’t so effective. If only because the modern world sees many men take active roles in households and childcare, just as many women now work in professional settings. We can still make more progress, of course, but today’s society looks different than 1983’s, a fact that makes Mr. Mom dated. Indeed, some of the film’s stereotypes are now borderline offensive.

Additionally, Jack and Caroline’s children are under featured, explanations of their presence, activity and care ignored, leaving us to wonder exactly what is happening with or to them.

The movie’s predictability is an even bigger issue. The moment Jack starts staying home, we know what is going to happen, both in terms of plot and character growth. Nothing in this movie surprises us. To be sure, Mr. Mom is funny enough that it doesn’t crumble under the weight of such conventionality, but a less predictable path would have served it well all the same.

20140305-112035 pm.jpg

Yet, through humor, fun performances and interesting characters, Mr. Mom still overcomes most of its flaws. It remains an entertaining comedy. Yes, it has limited thematic application for modern viewers, but it is fun all the same.


Despite some flaws, John Hughes’ screenplay vitalizes this comedy. The actors also help keep it lively.

My Rating: 7.5/10


42 thoughts on “Mr. Mom (1983) Guest Review

  1. I guess some films don’t age well and that’s why I’d never heard of it. Mind you, Hulk Hogan, Tommy Lee Jones and The Rock have done similar sounding role reversal films too in recent times so John Hughes was never short of good ideas.

    Michael Keaton sounds a great choice. There’s one he does where he plays a guy helping organise a brothel in a funeral home which means I can so picture him here. Neat review as always dude.

    • Thank you.

      I saw this one as a child, many times over. I loved it then, so much so that Keaton became one of my favorite actors. I picked it for this blogathon because I have been a Mr. Mom for the last four years, staying home with my own kids, a fact that made me want to see how this Dragoti/Hughes comedy held up.

      And the answer is I still like it, more or less, even if it no longer resonates.

      • They’ll either pick it up. Or go the opposite route in an attempt at rebellion. As they’re still so young, it’s hard to know which to expect most. 🙂

    • This was actually a pretty big film at the time, Alex. : ) I’m surprised some haven’t heard of it. I liked it quite a bit at the time. Really need to watch it again – it’s been YEARS.

      • Uncle Buck is the one that is on pretty regularly in holiday season. Whenever I read one of James’ reviews I always want to the film again ha.

      • I was happy I chose to watch this one again. It might not hold up,as comedy gold, but it is still good. 🙂

        And I’m with you – I too was surprised to read some comments telling me they hadn’t heard of this one. I thought it was one of his better known projects.

  2. Nice work, Josh! I’ve never seen this one because I’ve never liked Keaton. Maybe I’ll check it out sometime if it’s playing : )

  3. I’ve never actually seen this but i vaguely remember Keaton in something where he’s a cop that has to look after kids. You make an excellent point about how the subject matter is seriously out of date though 🙂

  4. Pingback: Revisiting Yesteryear | jjames reviews

  5. Pingback: Just Visiting (2001) Guest Review | Cinema Parrot Disco

  6. Pingback: Thanks To Everyone Involved With The John Hughes Blogathon | Cinema Parrot Disco

  7. Pingback: Remembering John Hughes On His Birthday | Cinema Parrot Disco

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s