This review for the John Hughes Blogathon comes from Josh of JJames Reviews. This is his second review after Mr Mom. Thanks for the reviews, Josh! Now let’s see what he thought of Just Visiting. 🙂
Just Visiting (2001)
Directed By: Jean-Marie Poire
Written By: John Hughes, Jean Marie Poire and Christian Clavier
Remake of Les Visiteurs (1993)
Starring
Jean Reno
Christina Applegate
Christian Clavier
Matthew Ross
Tara Reid
Bridgitte Wilson
Malcolm McDowell
Running Time: 87 minutes
Plot Synopsis
In the middle ages, a wealthy nobleman, Count Thibault (Jean Reno), is poised to marry the princess Rosalind (Christina Applegate) and live his days happily, but witchcraft forces him to kill Rosalind before their nuptials. In an effort to undo the sorcery and revive his beloved, Thibault and his peasant servant, Andre (Christian Clavier), enlist the help of an aged Wizard (Malcolm McDowell). But the Wizard’s spell goes horribly wrong, and Thibault and Andre find themselves transported to the twenty-first century.
My Opinion
First, I would like to thank Table 9 Mutant for allowing me to participate in her John Hughes’ Blogathon. Second I woud like to ask her . . . how did you let me pick such a terrible movie? Just . . . Just . . . How?
What, precisely, is wrong with this film? The better question: what isn’t wrong with it?
Let’s get more specific. Time travel is a tricky subject in fiction; it needs to make enough internal sense as to not bog down the project with confused questions. Equally problematically, it needs be simplex enough as to avoid inevitable contradictions once it is defined too much. By keeping time traveling mostly unexplained, Just Visiting manages one-half of this tricky formula, but it stumbles on the other half. As just one example, Thibault has a modern day descendent, despite the fact that he murdered his fiancée and was thereby sentenced to death, all before he conceived a child. How is such a thing possible? How did the man produce children? Just Visiting never bothers to explain.
Of course, time travel is a minor issue in comparison to the film’s failed attempts at humor. The best comedians understand that jokes generate laughter once, maybe twice, before growing stale, but such simple concepts escape Writer/Director Jean-Marie Poire and Co-Writers John Hughes and Christian Clavier. Thibault’s mistreatment of Andre is repeatedly played for laughs, which might have been fine, if the Count had occasionally varied his style of abuse, or even his insults. Ditto that for Thibault’s and Andre’s misunderstanding of modern conveniences (toilets, bathtubs, cars, etc). Because the jokes are never more than recycled versions of themselves, Just Visiting’s humor quickly grows tiresome, making this comedy decidedly not funny.
Given that this film’s humor fails, its attempts at drama better save it. They don’t. Partially because all of the characters, most especially Amber (pictured above), are archetypes with little to no depth. We do not care about these individuals, because they do not have personalities. Instead, they have one or two traits each. For that reason alone, when Julia and Andre stand up for themselves and eventually receive their rewards, we are not moved, a fact that mightn’t be problematic if Just Visiting were actually funny (see above).
John Hughes’ screenplay, in other words, is bad. In fact, between terribly developed characters, repetitive humor and senseless plot devices, it is an utter disaster.
So are most of the performances. Jean Reno never strikes the proper balance between slapstick comedian and straight man, and Christian Clavier’s comic turn is too over the top. Bridgette Wilson fails to do anything memorable with the terrible character she’s given, and Matthew Ross is wooden as the movie’s primary antagonist.
Only Christina Applegate and Malcolm McDowell rise above the material. When playing Julia, Applegate is good enough to almost make us forget that her character is no better developed than anyone else’s. McDowell, too, makes the most of limited screen time, if only because he is suitably exaggerated.
Conclusion
John Hughes does not redeem himself with Just Visiting. Like most people involved in making this movie, he ought to have been ashamed.
My Rating: 1/10
it,s a great movie it,s a great comedy much better then a lot of movies jean reno is great in this movie
Well. Obviously, we don’t agree. 🙂
I haven’t Les Visiteurs, but I wonder if I might like the original more.
Maybe I’ll watch the original! Then this….
Or maybe just the original. This is rotten. 😉
nicely done Josh, especially given the limitations of this movie.
I knew not to choose this one 🙂
I only picked it because it was one of the few that no one had selected. I was trying to help T9M get a review for every Hughes’ film. Surprisingly, it is actually worse than I expected it to be.
Lol. I think you still suffered through some bad ones, Rob. ; )
True that.
There’s a lot of hate out there for this movie… I didn’t hate it but that’s just me. Josh / Mutant – have you ever seen the original??? It’s French and called Les Visiteurs. It’s a really good movie. I’m being serious : )
I haven’t seen EITHER version!!!!!
You should totally watch the French one!
Now wait – HAVE I SEEN MORE HUGHES MOVIES THAN YOU??????????
I’ll try! Maybe… !
And… Nah. Unlikely! Sure I’ve seen more!
I haven’t seen Les Visiteurs, but that one is well appreciated by critics. The amazing thing is it’s the same director and stars, not to mention one of the same writers. Maybe they lost something in translation; I don’t know. Someday perhaps I’ll see it just to remove the taste of this flick. 🙂
Let us know if you DO watch the original! You could do a review comparing them. : )
Will do.
I am a John Hughes so I like almost everything he did, but this one, it’s just bad and not memorable. Good review!
I generally like Hughes, too. Planes and Trains and Automobiles, The Breakfast Club, and Ferris Bueller, for example, are some of my favorite comedies. But this one . . . this one is awful.
It sounds horrible good lord!
And it is.
*Fan
Not seen this one but, yeah, it doesn’t sound great. I’m starting to think I’ve seen fewer Hughes movies than others have!!! Lol. I really did just have a thing for the teen ones. : )
Oh dear. I hadn’t even heard of this one until now. I will steer clear. So sorry you had to suffer, Josh. I hope your recovery is going smoothly…Hahaha.
I actually watched and reviewed this in early February, so I’m long since over it. But I did take a three day break from movies after seeing it, I think. This one is truly dreadful.
It made you take a three-day break?? We shall never speak of it again!!!
Amen.
Three day break from movies?! Wow – it MUST be bad! Lol. Actually – when I see a really bad one I then want to watch another one right away to forget it! Like… I hope to watch something soon to get last night’s Red Dawn remake out of my mind!
It depends on the movie. Sometimes that’s my reaction, too. Sometimes it’s taking a break so as not to risk a similar experience.
Thanks for letting me participate, Mutant. Again. Sorry it has taken me so long to check out the post (and comments). Life hasn’t facilitated blogging recently.
No, thank you for the reviews! I feel like I’ve done no work for this blogathon. : ( I’ve only managed to write four reviews so far. And, hey – no problem! I’m two days behind on replying to comments here as I’ve been too busy. I’m just glad when guest reviewers DO reply to people’s comments! : )
WOW! You really didn’t like this, did you Josh? Great review, definitely skipping this!
Pingback: Hughes, Wayne, and Kubrick or: Two Comedies and a Western | jjames reviews
Pingback: Thanks To Everyone Involved With The John Hughes Blogathon | Cinema Parrot Disco
I’d never heard of this, and I am glad! Sounds abysmal.
Lol. I’ve still not seen it. Doubt I’ll bother. ; ) Maybe the original someday!
Pingback: Remembering John Hughes On His Birthday | Cinema Parrot Disco